Recently, the US Military decided on a variant of the Sig P320 for their next duty weapon.In case you’re reading this from underneath a wifi equipped rock, that weapon features a modular grip and fire control unit design. For the first time, the US Military is be able to issue one model of pistol for both deployed troops (Full Size P320) and Law Enforcement roles ( Like Air Force OSI) using the smaller grip frame.

Many are naturally upset their pet pistol didnt win the trials – unless they’re Sig fans. Regardless of what one’s brand of choice is or isnt, logistics is a powerful reason -and even for indvidual shooters it matters.

Take myself. Admittedly a self serving example, but hear this out. I have two Beretta 92 pistols, one for carry and one for training/backup. Between them I have ten available magazines, three holsters, and training experience with the Beretta’s DA/SA action of arms.

Were I to decide to switch to a Glock 17 , i’d not only have to consider the price of the pistol , but also the equipment needed to match what I already have in place with the 92.

The gun itself costs $550 dollars locally, and includes three magazines. So i’d need seven more to equal what I have with the 92FS. At $20 per, that means $140.00 in addition to the holster cost. Even if I just buy one conealable holster and two extra magazines, i’m out of pocket nearly $100.00 + the cost of the gun.

Because a Glock also uses a different action, i’d have to budget training time and ammo to become acclimated to the striker fired system. Let us assume 500 rounds of 9mm plus at least one range session. The combined cost of training : $200

So to transiton to a different pistol safely and confidently, the cost to do so would be -conservatively – $300. Plus the gun itself.

Out of pocket the cost to switch thus wouldn’t be $550 ; it would realistically be $850- a 54% premium over the gun price alone.

Is it any wonder the military went with the most modular option?

Why Revolvers are still Relevant.

Far be it for me to assume shooting 50 rounds through a Ruger GP100 qualifies me to pronounce judgement on the future of the 2nd Amendment in America.

So instead i’ll rely on human nature for my factual basis.

Even though we live in the Age of the 20 Round Semiauto Pistol, this young dude thinks there’s a relevant place for the revolver in the modern collection.

Two major reasons.

While I don’t subscribe to the “Doom + Gloom” prognostications attached to Hillary Clinton’s potential election , I do believe -regardless of who the POTUS is- that gun control regulation is in the offing at the Federal level long-term.

Why do I say that in an era of never-before-in-recent-memory expansion of gun rights across the country?

Nearly all of the legislative changes on that front have happened on a localized state-by-state level. The Feds have mostly stood by as states have modified and expanded their carry privlidges. This offers the Federal government an opprotunity to “do something” if national public opinion turns against firearms ownership.

The exact circumstances of how that’ll happen are beyond my limited powers of prophecy. Perhaps a terroist attack using legally purchased arms will be the catalyst. Maybe it’ll be a publically horrid act of negligence. Maybe an opprotunistic internet media intern trips over the wrong James Yeager youtube video.

No matter the cause , the response will be predictable enough -no more legal AR15s, no more high capacity anything. A repeat of the AWB will be likely, with stringent reinforcements of the details Version 1.0 got wrong such as the features type.

Insofar as carry guns goes, this’ll have an impact in two ways. With high capacity handguns restricted , revolvers will take center stage as the only uncontroversial form of personal defense. When the 20 round XDm 9 becomes both illegal to carry outside the home AND economically valuable ( as Class III arms did after 1986) suddenly the Smith .357 transitions from ancient collector piece to defensive tool.

The second impact will be economic. Demand goes up, supply ( in the short term) being constant equals increase in prices of both weapons and ammo. Those who already have a staple of 6 shooters naturally are in a better position then those without.

I don’t believe that scenario is liable to happen overnight. 10 years from now, though-different story.

The other reason isn’t dependent on future speculation. Revolvers have historical character no Glock will ever match. They hail from a different time in the American experience. They come from a culture where someone stood on their merits and not on their socioeconomic category. I won’t paint a rosy picture of the past, but when a person had to depend on 6 shots for their own survival it put a premium on personal skill at arms. “Combat Accurate” doesn’t fly when you only get six chances to come out on top. Either you hit who was trying to kill you-or they got you first.

Every press of the trigger on an old school, six pot revolver is a shot against the encroaching culture of mediocrity. It may not count much to anyone else, but that matters to me.

Make of that what you will.

Changing of the Guard.

“What the- its blocked?!!”

Thus began one of the more incredulous conversations of my life.

There I was, in uniform, in an office located on an Active Duty military installation. I was at the desk of my E-5 boss ,both of us wearing the uniform of the United States Air Force.

You know, the one that nuked two Japanese cities.

Here we were, two enlisted men,staring at the same words on his computer screen:


Were we trying to look up Edward Snowden’s blog? An NSA drop site? A secret Russian spy server?

The webpage which is so dangerous to national security that it’s blocked by military order is none other then http://www.springfield-armory.com/.

Times are a changin’ folks.

One of the creeds I stick to as a gun owner is the need for us to advance gun ownership as a culture. We need the latte-sipping hipsters to view gun ownership in the same vein as iPhones and flannel; because one day we won’t be able to rely on the vets and police to sustain the industry.

In the past Big Gun Companies marketed their wares to the Big Customers- law enforcement and military agencies. In turn , civilians would read about the Blast-o-matic 5000 and thus be motivated to add it to their collections. When the Blast-o-matic 5000A1 came out later the cycle repeats.

That’s how so many major guns we consider industry cornerstones got their status. Its how the Sig P226, Beretta 92, Glock 17 and others got their footholds. They were sold by Big Gun Companies to Big Government Customers, and the civilians became spillover clients as they bought what their Veteran and Military pals recommended and used.

The pioneers of handgun technique like (Col)Jeff Cooper and other contemporaries started in uniform. As have most industry leaders since.

What me and my gun-loving boss encountered that day wasn’t just an inconvenient site block. It was the PC future of the DoD- and government in general. People in management positions in many LE agencies and most of the military unfortunately come from the academic view that firearms are at best a necessary evil, and worst case a dangerous asset in need of strict regulation.

That culture and attitude inevitably trickles down to the newer members of the organization; until one day military members arent even allowed to look at webpages about the very guns they’re called upon to use.

What does this mean going forward?
We cannot rely on veterans and cops to be the ambassadors of gun ownership. Not in a day and age where most people with live fire basic handgun classes are better trained then non-frontline support troops.

The gun guru’s of the past and present came from public service backgrounds. It is unlikely many will in the future.

We have to turn the marketing machine and culture around; from the instutitonal level to an individual one. No longer can gun ownership remain the cultural domain of current and ex cops/military -with a few hangers on in the civilian world. The RKBA must be a champion issue of minorities, women, and the hipster latte crowd in the years to come. That’s where the votes are, and thats where the culture of the nation rests on. It may seem that’s a controversial place to trust the future of our legal and cultural right to keep and bear arms, and that’s not an untrue perspective.

Yet one thing on this topic is sure- relying on Big Government with leadership like Obama and Clinton to act as a cultural leader of weapons ownership is a ticket to future irrelevance for the RKBA.

To secure the future of gun ownership in America, we must groom and inspire the future Jeff Coopers and Ernest Langdon’s from outside the .gov pool.

Alton Serling & Money.

What does Alton Serling’s death have to do with money?

Well get to that.

First, lets start with the tale of another black man with a gun.


Im in a stack. Which is a weird term for five people with guns , lined up against a stone wall bracing for the Unknown.

Its time.

The first one rolls into the room. As per training, I follow as Man #2.
Its hot.
Hot and still. Like the kind of stillness I felt as a kid ,during the long stretch of time before Dad came home on Report Card Day.

I clear the room on the right. Lots of furniture, lots of places for trouble to come out from.
Maybe the suspect’s hiding in the next corner. My mind turns to the various ways I’d be killed; maybe the suspect is hiding behind a wall where he’ll cap me as I cross the doorway. Maybe he’d wait until I came into a dark room before riddling me with rounds.

Barricaded with a gun, the dispatch brief said. The phrase imparted both too much info & and not enough at the same time.

No time for those thoughts, not now. Folks were depending on me.

“CLEAR”. I yell as per protocol.

The other team members clear their rooms. No shots fired. No orders given.
I think maybe we’ve dodged a bullet.
But there’s one room left.

And its dark.

I go in, gun drawn. Why doesn’t this thing have NIGHT SIGHTS????!!!!

The lights come on.


Time slows down.
My teammate has the suspect. But he’s not putting down the gun.

He’s not doing it. Not at all. Rather then getting on the ground and making our day’s easier, he’s advancing on my teammate. His own gun is drawn, but said teammate was walking backward.

Im giving him time. Remember your training, come on. ACT!

The suspect advances into danger close distance.


The Glock 17 barks twice. I aim for the head next when I remember very suddenly that this was a TRAINING exercise…..and shooting the local SWAT Commander in the face with a sim gun would be VERY rude.

He announces the safe word, and the exercise is concluded.

Note carefully that for many brave men and women near you, the above is not merely a conclusion to a six month class on Police Procedures. It is their life’s work.

Every day, 8+ hours during each shift, frequently seven days a week.

That sort of stress is not something a typical American experiences even momentarily.
The people who look at a police shooting with the attitude that deadly force is always excessive aren’t necessarily malicious. They simply dont realize the daily reality police officers face in the course of their duties.

They view the event through their own life experiences, and most law abiding folks don’t have to fight people and search for armed , hostile attackers multiple times in a week.

As such, most folks are just plain unaware of what police deal with. Which results in this national craze of “Racist Cops Shooting Black People”.

Like most national crazes, this one is about money. We’ve established that most public members of the nation don’t experience violence most street cops deal with on a daily basis.
It breeds an information vaccum which ambitious media members fill with good sound bytes about “Cops Killing Black People”.Lacking education on what cops really deal with and only seeing a video of a bleeding black man , people jump to the only conclusion they can based on the data they have-which is that cops are systematically assaulting minorities.

More average people join the bandwagon as it gains social steam, and the feedback loop increases.

As a black man who’s been carrying for the last 5 years, I can safely say no officer i’ve encountered has been anything but civil and nice to me during the interactions. In two cases I was actually cut a break by the responding cop ,one of which involved a street racing incident so reckless even I admit I royally deserved a trip to jail.

In fact many officers are more compassionate about the nature of ethnic strife then anyone else in the government is likely to be, because they see it day in and day out like the residents do.

Unlike the state governor, the cheif social worker, or the deputy cheif of police all of whom are isolated from the street by offices and political authority,the street cop who stops you for speeding may have spent more time in the ghetto then one may think. The systemic issues behind why minorities are worse off economically and politically are both beyond the scope of THIS post, and beyond the powers of a uniformed officer to resolve.

All of this is to say- dont buy the bullshit being sold on TV and the media around you.
Use your head. Take a course in armed self defense, EVEN if you hate firearms and weapons.Dont assume that a video tells the whole story. Context matters.

Because Alton Serling’s death wasn’t just a tragedy for both the cops forced to kill him and the family who’s lost a loved one. Alton Serling’s death represented a profit opprotunity for thousands of media outlets nationwide needing a story to sell. It also represented a chance for academics unused to producing real work to turn a real life tragedy into an imaginary social cause for edifying their own careers.

Alton Serling’s blood on the pavement translated to real dollars in the pockets of folks who’d just as soon make the entirety of America a national ghetto if it boosted ratings -and thus the share value of their media firms.

Even if you’re the kind of person who has ethical issues killing a mosquito, being educated in armed self defense and the laws thereof can’t hurt you. Knowing the truth is the first step in changing our society from one that sways with the media-sold wind , from one informed enough to be worthy to exercise the rights the same society holds and cherishes so dear.

As the Bible says; people perish for lack of knowledge. Dont be one of them.

Competition, and Handgun Shooting.

I’ll do something no one else on the internet has ever done-comment on two subjects they only know a marginal amount about.

On a serious note however, today marks an important personal milestone-I shot my first USPSA match, ever.

More importantly, I had fun doing it. I wasn’t treated like an outsider or some oddity of nature by the folks attending, but as another individual worthy of being given a chance to step to the starting box.Their example of welcoming my newbie self -dumb questions and all (what’s a procedural?) – was as noble as it was thourough , and is a credit to the shooting community. You guys (and gals!) know who you are.

That brings me to what this post is about- competition shooting as a vehicle to intro newbies.

Often when the subject of gun ownership is broached to new shooters, the first viewpoint offered is the Mega Serious One- “Self Defense” and all the boogeymen that nasty subject entails, legal and moral alike. Without getting lost in the philosophical weeds, let’s just stick to basic generalities. Like the fact many people will not now be or ever become comfortable with taking a human life under any circumstances.

If the barrier of entry into the shooting sports is a long, serious speech about “Sheepdogs vs Sheep vs Wolves” and putting “bodies on the floor” , to use a turn of phrase, the shooting sports will never gain proper traction. It would be akin to Toyota advertising pickup trucks with a long advert on “surviving car accidents and injury preparedness”. Yes, a crash may happen. But automakers don’t lead their advertising with that fact, despite driving a car being a common way most of us end up in the hospital.

We need to make the public aware of how accessible and fun gun ownership can be. Even in anti-gun jurisdictions, owning a pistol/rifle/shotgun and using it in competition isn’t an inordinately expensive activity (although it sure can be in the advanced shooting categories!). By starting with the fun aspect, we can neutralize the anti-gun stigma firearms ownership tends to invoke.

Further, its a concept the opposition can’t credibly oppose. Everyone regardless of gender or personal politics understands the benign nature of sports and athleticism. Few understand the grueling necessity and gut-wrenching effects of necessary violence in personal defense.

I know which concept we should use to expand gun ownership to the masses , and it sure ain’t the last one.

Selling Gun Ownership : Culture

As I type this now, in a Sioux Falls South Dakota cafe , there’s a small crowd of well dressed people walking down the street, dresses and suit jackets flowing in the not-inconsiderable wind.

Believe it or not, this is atypical behavior for this state. Show up to your typical South Dakota wedding in a suit, and you’ll be either moderately or extremely overdressed on occasion. Showing up to a Chicago wedding in a mere “suit” would be a slight against the couple.

No , i’m not taking ad money from Bridal Magazine. My point is simple-culture matters.

Culture , in day to day reality, is that unwritten series of social rules by which an area operates on. Sometimes these social codes of conduct have factual basis – example, big pickups are unpopular in Southern California because practically speaking they’re a pain to park in crowded cities. They’re conversely almost a social totem in the rural Midwest and South, used like vehicular statues proclaiming their owner’s prowess -or perhaps only a monument to personal insecurity combined with credit card debt.

In any event, rural folks dont worry about street parking or merging in six lane congestion, so bigger trucks are a practical vehicle choice .

Firearms , like cars and clothes, aren’t immune to the social rules of human behavior. Why it is acceptable to own an AR15 in North Dakota and not so in New York State has less to do with fact , and more to do with entrenched cultures.

The way it works -guns are restricted in a given pro-gun urban area to a limited extent, say minor licensing.

People who live there forget about life before Gun Law X was passed, at which point whatever restriction was last enacted becomes the “New Normal”. The next politican or community activist suggests a stronger law in its place, that law passes , then 5 years or more down the road it too becomes the “New Normal”.

On and on it goes, until you get Great Britian.

I learned this dynamic from an unexpected source. When my grandfather passed, military commitments kept me from paying my respects. Months later when I could take leave, mom filled me in on his life history. As it so happened, Illinois at that time was a relatively conservative state gun-wise.

Granddad kept a 30-30 lever gun in the house , defending the home his job at the Kenosha American Motors plant paid for. No stinkin’ IDs or background checks either- he’d regularly take mom and my uncle shooting at the nearby quarry.

That was in the 1960s . If you’re reading this , you’re likely familiar enough with modern day Illinois regulations to know that’d be totally illegal today .

Because of the gradual nature of this cultural change from pro-gun to anti-gun , arguing directly against its adherents can take on a religious fervor. That’s because Gun Control is likely the only cultural background someone in such a place knows. When a person says being an anti is foolish, its not critiquing the argument-its criticising that individuals very culture. It may be perhaps two or three generations before you’d find a gun owner in a modern day native NYC or LA resident’s family tree.

We won’t be making any lasting changes going down that route.

I submit, what must be done is literally counter-cultural.

We must give the modern generation relateable reasons to consider gun ownership, and ones totally independent of the Constitution, morality, religion, or the color of the current majority US political party.

If we keep insulting the people we need to back us in the polls, the end result will be a nation of rural gun owners being governed by a voting majority of city people who associate gun ownership with the Ford Edsel and Dwight Eisenhower.

Selling Gun Ownership-Necessity.

To understand why I’m going to say the following, some background is in order.

Did your Ma and Pa sit down in front of the fireplace, and review the pertinent details of gun ownership and the importance thereof?

Mine didn’t.

It took a public sector job with the United States Air Force and an attendant trip to Kelly Base Range for my first exposure to guns, at the ripe young age of 23. Prior to that, i’d grown up in Chicago-where gang bangers kill each other almost as fast as the news can blame it on the NRA.

The culture in one of the most anti-gun areas in America is, unsurprisingly, hostile to weapons. Its one of the few common cultural ties in the area. A gang banger’s mother from the rough side of Englewood , a Highland Park IL socialite, and a middle class schoolteacher won’t share much-but they’re likely to share a disspassionate dislike of firearms.

My own family was no different in this area. As such, I came to the People of the Gun as a latter-life convert to the cause. So when I speak about marketing gun ownership to anti’s, it is not from an academic background.

The first place to start is necessity.

In major urban areas -Chicago among them- the only practical use of a gun is the most extreme. Not many deer trample through State Street and Wacker Drive, as it were. Further, 911 really is just a phone call away, and urban areas tend to have massive police agencies with a visible public presence.

In the country ,the necessity of a firearm is much less esoteric.
Most rural parts of America don’t have a deep law enforcement presence. When the local Sheriffs department has 8 people covering 150+ square miles of territory , and they’re operating on a shoestring budget at that, Joe Public in Ruralville USA doesn’t need an active imagination to realize the utility of a Glock in the cupboard. 911? If your device even has consistent service to start with, it’ll take 10+ minutes for LE to get to your location. Out in the country, there’s no illusions against this cold fact ;whatever personal defense problem a household has is up to them to solve.

Making city folk understand this is crucial; the average law abiding soul in Big Cityville never dials 911 frequently, making them unaware of the fact that even a 5 minute response time can be 4.5 minutes too late if Mr Bad Guy is paying them a visit. We need to start with this basic premise-because discussing legalities , rules, the Constitution, or ‘Murrica before laying down this basic fact is truly putting the cart before the horse.

To sell gun ownership to the anti-gun masses, we must first start there.

Selling Gun Ownership-Gear.

Numbers Matter. Opinions Dont.

“Men lie. Women Lie. Numbers Don’t”

-Jay Z.

Even if you despise hip-hop & rap music, the above line by JayZ is no less true.

Its a relevant topic, because in human socializing there’s a common tendency to BS and exaggerate. Whether we’re talking about rap lyrics, the size of a truck engine, or the latest quarter’s earnings by an ethically challenged company cooking its financial statements, there’s the temptation to decieve and exaggerate for one’s own benefit or to appear like a “boss” in front of a crowd.

The gun world isn’t exempt from this social more, sadly.

My goal in using practical analytics to improve my shooting isn’t strictly to help GardoneVT hit the target faster and more accurately. Its hopefully to chart a better way for folks across the country to improve besides bringing a box of ammo to a range and winging it.

Lets take it back to Colonel Jeff Cooper. If you don’t know who that is, please ask Google and come back. No gun owner should be ignorant of his name and contributions.

Why? Because before Col. Jeff Cooper, there wasn’t a civilian accessible training industry to speak of. Sure there was the FBI and various government shooting academies, but they were public agent accessible only and , being institutions, were not free of internal bias and politics. In short-Jeff Cooper broke open the knowledge logjam and made advanced firearm skill acessible to the Ordinary Joe.

Sadly, there’s no shortage of unsafe and bogus charlatains out there huslting lies instead of teaching people viable firearms methods and techniques. Stopping that is practically impossible-unlike other industries with regulatory bodies , there’s an active subset of the US government which seeks to end gun ownership in this country. That political bloc will have no qualms using a Firearms Instructors Oversight Agency as a fulcrum to ban nationwide gun instruction by attrition.

So, the practical counter to avoiding the hucksters is individual, measured improvement. This is not to say that proper outside instruction isn’t necessary-in fact its critical for outside oversight to ensure errors are not being perpetuated which the shooter doesn’t know they’re doing. But that outside instruction must also be balanced with internal measurement and calculation of one’s own performance with one’s own gear on one’s own resources.

Because in the field, thats exactly what all of us will have to rely on in the Terrible Moment-our own performance, and at whatever level it really is. For the sake of our own safety and that of our families, we should work to ensure our performance is charted and evaluated as accurately as possible.

That means using numbers. Because when the flag flies, marketing copy and bro-manship ego won’t save you.

Blackhawk! SERPA is a Safety Hazard.

For those unable to watch the above video, it depicts the normal results of operating the SERPA: the users trigger finger ends up in the gun’s trigger guard.

This is not a holster, any more then a Honda Accord without a front hood on chopped factory shocks and boosted with an un-tuned 125 shot Nitrous on the stock engine internals is a racecar. It is a timebomb waiting for a place to happen and a person to happen to.

The guy in the above video isn’t a rank amateur, either. If the host of Guns and Ammo TV ends up violating one of the 4 Rules on camera using this product (as it is unworthy of the name “holster”) ,safe to say most of us will too.

Now lets assume you, dear reader, have more experience then most law enforcement agencies and instructors who’ve rightfully banned the use of this abortive product. Assuming you have superior skill under fire and stress, why would you use a retention device with a demonstrated history of not only encouraging negligent discharges, but also fails when exposed to soil and debris in a way which traps the pistol?

A message to fellow range safety officers and LE range staff-I implore you to do the best you can to advocate these holsters are banned from your facility. Blackhawk is a company, so their directive is the bottom line and not customer safety (else they’d discontinue or heavily redesign this abortive thing).Its up to us to get the word out and up the chains of our site and agency managers to have this hazard removed. If people can’t use these things in any class or range near them and ask why, word of mouth will spread and this will either be discontinued or redesigned into a less hazardous form.

An Essay on Open Carry.

It was a Tuesday night. Usually Tuesdays in this midwest college town were sleepy affairs, especially at the office I worked at after school.

This one was going to be a memorable one, and for the wrong reasons. At the time I worked in wireless sales; so I wore business attire and sold overpriced electronics. I don’t know what it was about my store which provoked a man into walking into it with an openly carried Rock Island Armory 1911 Tactical, but he nevertheless did so.

Immediately the mood in the store changed. My customer, a husband watching me program his wife’s new iPhone, started keeping a wary eye on the guy. The Rock Island bearer was an overweight, excessively bearded man whose wife wore a look of practiced resignation as she carried their kid through the store. Given that I was 50% of the available staff and my coworker was himself occupied, this meant the newcomers had to wait for service.

The entire time ,I’m keeping a closer eye on his weapon then I am the work i’m doing. And I don’t care. I only take my attention away breifly once I see its carried hammer down, which mean he’d have to fumble-fuck with the gun if harm was intended.

This fact was lost on my customers, who were so upset that they followed up with the corporate office on the matter. While I didn’t personally answer for the fact that the business was disrupted by the Open Carrier’s presence, his actions nevertheless were not interpreted by anyone there as a “RKBA act of activism”.

This is the basic fact so many in the “My RIGHTS” camp fail to notice. Firearms are tools of violence, a fact every layperson understands. When they see a man walk into a social area unaccustomed to public display of guns -read, everywhere not a gun range or gun shop- they immediately set the occupants on edge. Any possible activism or evangelism is obscured by the latent fact that someone with a deadly weapon and unknown intent is in the area.

As an aware shooter, seeing a harmless guy walk into my store with an openly carried -if tactically ineffective-gun was still cause for alarm. He may have been a happy go lucky family guy. Or he could decide to pull his weapon and blow away half the customers. Nowadays when ISIL is routinely shooting up civilian areas, its hard to know the difference between Harmless Open Carrier and Imminent Threat To Human Life. The average person is not going to spend time trying to sort the two out and will default to the latter.

It is that fact which makes any sort of armed open-carry “protest” a farce on its face. What the actual motivation is of the people who walk through state capitols with gas masks and slung AKMs is beyond my time and patience to determine here. What I can state confidently is that its NOT helping.

Open carry has a place, to be sure.

Let it not be said that the entire practice is some evil sin equivalent to firearms incest. As you can see at the top of this post, I have my trusty Beretta locked into a Safariland retention leg holster. This is not done because i’m trying to be the firearms equivalent of a Mormon evangelist-the range I work at mandates yellow safety vests be worn when on duty. Said vests SEVERELY compromise a concealed carry draw, and an open carry holster in the traditional belt position only acts as a shelf for the polyester safety vest.Attempting to draw from a regular belt holster openly worn results in a handful of safety vest being grabbed along with the pistol.
The drop leg places the gun low enough to clear the yellow safety vest and thus permit an unimpeded draw.

That’s it. I’ll never wear it in a public space outside of the range I RSO at, and as soon as I leave the building its coming off. Not just because of tactical matters, or the law ( open carry in public is legal here) or because I’m somehow afraid to show the weapon and evangelize the RKBA. I take it off because rights cannot be exercised without responsibility, and we have a duty as law abiding gun owners to not only exercise the RKBA-but to do so in a socially responsible manner.

That is how we accomplish RKBA activism. Not with gas masks and AKMs in the Subway line, but responsible exercise of our rights.